• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

JewFem Blog

This JewFem blog focuses on feminist issues in Jewish life. It tackles Jewish education, synagogue life, Israel, Jewish community, bits of pop culture, and more. This blog is written by Dr. Elana Maryles Sztokman, writer, educator, and researcher, contributing writer at the Forward Sisterhood, author of the book, “The Men’s Section: Orthodox Jewish Men in an Egalitarian World”.


Dr. Ruth Calderon is starting a revolution in Israel.

The new Knesset member on Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid party is a Talmudic scholar who built two secular batei midrash (houses of learning), Elul and Alma, both of which are among the most significant educational institutions at the center of the Jewish secular renewal in Israel. And this week, in her introductory speech at the Knesset, she did something astonishing: She taught a passage of Talmud.

This was remarkable for several reasons. First, Israeli society has been trained to associate traditional Jewish sources with the ultra-Orthodox community, whose entire belief that only elite orthodox men can truly understand Talmud is at the heart of some of the most heated debates about social and economic issues in Israel. Suddenly, we had a secular feminist breaking all of the molds and expectations by owning the text. Moreover, she taught the text — a passage from Ketubat 62b about Rabbi Rechumei, who forgot to come home to his wife on Yom Kippur. And she taught it with the tenderness and care of someone who deeply loves the text.

The ultra-Orthodox community is already terrified at this reality. “She is challenging our entire way of life,” the Kikar Shabbat website wrote this morning, as if to say that a secular woman to be embracing Talmud this way goes against many of their sacred assumptions.

But it’s not just what she taught but also how she taught. Her reading of the text was enlightened, inspired and real. She brought the story to life, connecting it to the human condition, making it relatable and present. Her reading of the words was literal, which clearly troubled the Shas Speaker of the Knesset, who rudely interrupted her and offered a much more midrashic, “traditional” and, in my opinion, stretched, reading. In one of the greatest moments of the talk, while Knesset members loudly chastised the Speaker for interrupting, Dr. Calderon gracefully turned to him and said, “That’s okay. I’m always happy to share words of Torah.” That kind of gentility is not something that is often seen in the Knesset. It was at that moment when I realized the enormity of the change she is ushering in. This is not just about teaching Talmud but about challenging the entire social discourse in Israel. Dr. Calderon is a great rebbe, now Knesset member. The possibilities are captivating.

Hits: 1075 0 Comments

Tamar Frankiel NewDr. Tamar Frankiel, an accomplished and impressive Jewish scholar, was recently appointed President of the Academy for Jewish Religion in California (AJRCA), making her the first Orthodox woman to head a rabbinical college. The author of seven books on Jewish mysticism and religion, including one on women in Judaism titled, The Voice of Sarah: Feminine Spirituality and Traditional Judaism, Dr. Frankiel has an illustrious record of teaching and scholarship and is considered a leading expert on Jewish mysticism. In honor of her new appointment, Dr. Frankiel shared some of her experiences and insights with JOFA Executive Director Elana Sztokman: 

How long have you been involved with AJRCA?

Eleven years, first as faculty, then as Dean of Students in 2003, and Dean of Academic Affairs in 2008.

Tell me a little bit about your background (professionally and religiously).

I have been in academia for over thirty years, mostly in part-time positions because I was also raising a family of five and wanted to be doing research and writing as well. We also needed to be in a place with good Jewish education, which limited our choices. Until I came to AJRCA, I worked in public universities teaching world religions, American religions, and some Jewish studies, and also had been teaching in the Jewish community in adult education venues.

I have been observant for almost the same length of time, after coming to Judaism as an adult and growing into it with my husband.  First, in northern California, we were with affiliated with a Renewal group, then with Chabad.  In Los Angeles, we have had many Jewish choices and have been regularly affiliated with two small congregations.  

How does it feel to be in your new position?

I am very excited and eager to do this work. I worked very closely with Rabbi Mel Gottlieb, the previous president of AJRCA (also orthodox), and led the school through the process of academic accreditation, so I have been involved with all levels of the school. In that sense, it is a natural step for me.  But at the same time, representing AJRCA to the community is another dimension.

What does it mean to be the "first orthodox woman heading a rabbinical school"?

Let's be clear that this is a trans-denominational school, independent, not affiliated with any movement. It is not just a rabbinical school though; we educate rabbis, cantors, and chaplains to serve a wide spectrum of Jewish communities, but we do not expect our clergy graduates to be accepted by Orthodox congregations because of different norms and standards -- including that AJRCA ordains women.

Still, even among liberal rabbinical schools, it is a rare position for a woman. According to our research, there has been only one other female president, in the 1990s at the Academy for Jewish Religion in New York (we are not affiliated schools, though we were briefly affiliated in the past, hence the similar names). Surely, with more women on rabbinical and cantorial faculties, there will be a female president elsewhere at some point, but the corridors of the seminaries still tend to be crowded with men.

Orthodoxy is another story.  This could only happen in a non-denominational school like AJRCA.  It certainly would not happen in an Orthodox rabbinical school, nor would it be likely to happen in a school associated with one of the other movements -- they would want a president who could fully affirm their ideology. 

What this signifies is a deep commitment to pluralism on the part of AJRCA. We really mean it when we say people of all Jewish backgrounds and commitments can study here, work here, teach here, and contribute to the rich exchange of perspectives that make up twenty-first century Judaism. The Orthodox perspective is honored, and so are all the others.  

How are you involved in the Orthodox community?

Primarily, I have been involved in the community through my family, guiding my children through the schools, participating in community service and in events of interest with my husband. I have also occasionally taught adult classes for women. Increasingly over the past ten years, my academic and professional life has involved more of my time.

Do you consider yourself a feminist, and what does that mean to you?

Yes, in a couple of ways. First, it is clear that historically and worldwide, there are many situations where women are disadvantaged and even endangered because of their gender and exploited because of their weak position. Every person has an obligation to fight such conditions, and women have an additional obligation to speak out because, frankly, we know how it feels.

Second, even when women have basic rights, there are areas where gender disqualifies them from seeking to fulfill their potential as they understand it. When I wrote The Voice of Sarah over twenty years ago, I said that the essential thing was to hear women's authentic voices, and to discover where we really do see ourselves as different from men and contributing in different ways -- as well as where we need to be included as genuine and completely equal partners. These are not easy to sort out in actual communities, and there is a lot of pressure not to talk about it too much. We still tend to substitute ideological positions for honest conversation.

What do you think are the greatest challenges facing Orthodox women today?

I am concerned about the immense social pressure on Orthodox women not to talk about what is important to them personally, because they put their families first. This is not just a Jewish or Orthodox woman's problem -- it was at the root of the whole feminist movement! But we have been pushed into a corner on this one, as we are told over and over again that we are the last bastion of family values. We aren't, but even if we were, if such an attitude stifles honesty, it is unhealthy for the family in the long run. We need to talk openly without fear, about whatever affects our health, our stability as family members, our fulfillment of the potential God has given us. 

That's very general, a broad-brush concern. More specifically, I think we face a real spiritual challenge. Twenty years ago, there was a sense of ferment and energy in women's explorations, even when davening together on our side of a high mechitzah. Perhaps it is just where I live, or a generational change, but I am concerned that the fire has died down.  Synagogues everywhere face this problem, but we as Orthodox women need to inspire our daughters or the next generation will turn somewhere else.  I think, as you do at JOFA, that ritual inclusion can be a big part of this, but there are other pieces too, like music and meditation, that we can investigate -- and learn from our non-Orthodox sisters.

What changes would you like to see in the Orthodox community over the next few years?

I would like to see more positive attitudes toward Jews outside Orthodoxy who are doing good, and a greater willingness to talk and collaborate.  Sometimes you have to choose between being right and being in a relationship, and I think we Jews need to find ways to be in relationship with one another.

I also would like to see Orthodoxy honoring women – and men, for that matter – for their contributions in the secular world.  Maybe I am just not looking in the right places, but I rarely see Orthodox publications writing about our leaders in various professions, academic scholars, CEOs, etc. Part of our job is to tend God's creation and this work should be honored too.

Do you think that gender challenges cross denominations?

Yes, because unconscious attitudes change slowly, even though policies and public statements toward women in authority have changed.  For example, women are more likely to be criticized on issues of personal appearance than are men.  Male behavior is still the standard, too, and a woman can easily get caught between being "too masculine" (forceful, commanding, etc) or "too feminine" (not directing enough, accommodating, etc).

However, we in Orthodoxy have structural challenges to women exercising authority that the other denominations do not have. I was shocked to learn recently that a community split over the nomination of a woman to be head of a day school. And, as JOFA women well know, many congregations don't let women be synagogue president or similar offices, despite helpful RCA statements.

How do you think you may be able to use your new position to affect positive changes -- in terms of gender and other things -- in the Jewish world, including the Orthodox community?

My main work is building AJRCA, increasing the impact of what we teach -- how to be a welcoming, inclusive community, develop our spiritual lives, and enhance the contribution each person can make to the Jewish community and the world.

That is what we do.  That is our statement to the world, and I hope others can hear it, Orthodox or not.

To the extent that I can do more, I would love to foster interdenominational discussion, particularly among women. It is a little easier for us, I believe, to relax ideological barriers and share common concerns. If anyone wants to fund women's retreats for that purpose, I'll be there!

What do you think the JOFA community can do in order to help advance more Orthodox women in communal leadership roles?

Positive publicity is a big contribution you make already. This helps women recognize that being observant is not a barrier, and conversely that an Orthodox woman in a significant position is good for our public image.

But there is something deeper. According to the story I learned of Sarah Schneirer, who founded the first Bais Yaakov schools, she convinced rabbis to support her because she pointed out that women were using their talents in the secular world. They were studying French and secular music -- and probably much more frivolous things -- instead of Torah. I know many Orthodox women in management positions in the secular world -- we are losing their talents when they could be contributing to the community. We need to make this point again and again.

Let's not forget about talking to our husbands, brothers, and fathers about this. We don't need to split men and women over things that are good for the community and good for individual women.  We are very fortunate to live in a time when we can make an impact on the world as observant Jews trying to live according to the Divine will. We can do it together.

 

Read the rest at the JOFA blog http://www.jofa.org/Community/JOFA_Blog/Interview_with_Tamar_Frankiel/

Hits: 1331 0 Comments

The proud feminism of an unprecedented number of women political leaders is new to the Israeli political scene. But after the elections, there will be a lot of work to do to translate this into real leverage and real change for women in Israel.

Tzipi Livni and Shelly Yacimovich talking, two months ago.
Tzipi Livni and Shelly Yacimovich. Photo by Nir Kafri

Israel’s Election Day is upon us, but the women’s vote is still up for grabs. Parties from right to left, religious and secular, are engaging in an overt battle to appeal not only to women, but to feminist-minded folks in general. This is an unprecedented trend in Israeli politics, and if Israel follows the recent American elections, women may constitute a still-underestimated demographic in the Israeli election.

From the beginning of this election season, there have been several key moments marked by historic gender events. Not only are there currently six parties headed by women, including two major parties – Shelly Yacimovich of Labor and Tzipi Livni of Hatnuah – but all of these women are also actively advocating for a broad feminist agenda of gender equity. In fact, women representatives of all major parties gathered last week in a remarkable show of cross-party collaboration to jointly advocate for women’s leadership. This is the first election where these powerful calls are being heard in such a multi-partisan way.

Moreover, the proud feminism is new. Golda Meir, the only woman prime minister in Israel’s history, may have broken the Knesset ceiling that one time in 1969, but she was also avowedly anti-feminist. Yacimovich, by contrast, was elected as her party leader after having spent an entire career as a feminist activist. Livni, who was known to distance herself Golda-like from the pro-feminist agenda during her stint as justice minister, has done a complete about-face over the past few years, openly seeking out feminist allies and making frequent and unequivocal statements about the collective challenges that women face. “I used to think that the obstacles I faced in politics were my own,” Livni famously said at a feminist conference at Ben Gurion University two years ago, “but I finally realized that women everywhere face the same obstacles. That was a turning point for me.”

Hits: 263 0 Comments

When asked at a JOFA panel about the status of women in Israel and what can be done to protect women’s basic rights, I replied that I would first make it illegal for a political party that has no women on its list to run for the Knesset. Thankfully, I’m not alone in this sentiment. In fact, a new movement is beginning to form of Orthodox and ultra-Orthodox women fighting against the exclusion of women from religious political parties.

Esti Shoshan, a haredi journalist, recently started a Facebook page called Lo nivharot, lo boharot, which means “If we can’t be elected, we are not voting.” As of this writing, the group has over 800 likes — perhaps not the stuff of a Steve Jobs fan page, but signs of movement nonetheless. And it comes at a particularly significant time in the development of religious politics. The legality of religious parties of Shas and United Torah Judaism is currently being debated by the Elections Council, under the leadership of Supreme Court justice Elyakim Rubinstein, based on a petition filed by a coalition of seven organizations led by Jerusalem city council member Laura Wharton contesting the systemic exclusion of women from party lists.

“The sad situation of women’s under-representation in the Knesset, is imminent,” the petition states, adding that, “an absurd situation has been created in which the country subsidizes bodies that discriminate against women.”

Women have a “different role” than men, Shas and United Torah Judaism wrote in their response. “The parties function, as demanded by the halakha (Jewish law), with clear segregation between men and women for reasons of modesty. Men have one role and women have another. This segregation does not exclude women, discriminate against them nor deem them less worthy than men.”

Hits: 344 0 Comments

The event was a tremendous gathering of Jewish feminists. The fifty people in the room — almost all women — came from organizations representing many aspects of Jewish life: Reform rabbis, a dean at the Jewish Theological Seminar, Orthodox clergy and senior professionals from a range of Jewish women’s organizations. We were all there because Joanna and AWP had touched us in some way. Remember her commitment to pledging men as allies in promoting women’s leadership? Her guidance in teaching women how to “ask”? Her efforts at promoting women’s advancement in Jewish organizations? A tribute to Joanna as well as the diverse and wide reach of AWP, the good-bye party became a celebration of the minds and spirits of Jewish women, especially those who spend their lives making a difference in the Jewish community through not-for-profit work.

Hits: 904 0 Comments

Tzipi Livni, the incumbent Kadima chair who lost Tuesday’s party primary to former Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, is not your typical Israeli politician. She’s just not slimy enough. When she speaks, she seems to be telling you what she actually believes. In a profile of her in Yediot Aharonot last year, the worst thing people said about her was that she wasn’t friendly enough and sometimes closed her door so as not to be interrupted. So either she is too aloof or too protective of her privacy. Either way, she didn’t play the game right. Actually, that’s probably why she lost. She does not have the callousness required to win in Israeli politics.Tsipi Livni

Shaul Mofaz, on the other hand, we have a glut of guys like him in Israeli politics — men who think that they have everything coming to them because they know how to lead troops to war. What this has to do with actually running an actual country eludes me, unless you count the demands for an inflated ego and a big car, which seem to be common to both jobs.

The overabundance of generals leading our fragile nation explains a lot about the situation we are in vis à vis our neighbors as well as vis à vis ourselves: Everything is viewed as a war.

Whether talking about security, environmental issues or social justice, the general — or former general — always sees the other person as an adversary to be out-maneuvered, out-manipulated and ultimately beaten. It explains why despite months of intense and broadly supported social justice protests, little has changed. In fact, electricity prices went up 26% in the past 12 months.

Hits: 1063 0 Comments

 

Hillary Clinton/ Getty Images  Hillary Clinton has made some important people in Israel angry. But she has made a whole bunch of other people, especially women, really happy. I, for one, am grateful to Clinton.

I’m referring, of course, to her now viral comments that she is “worried” about Israel democracy, and about the status of women. Both issues should give all of us pause, and she gets a special kudos for linking the two issues, something no public figure had effectively done until now.

Clinton’s democracy concern stems from a series of troubling legislation that has recently been discussed and in some cases passed in the Knesset, led by several key Likud and Yisrael Beitenu parliamentarians. The bills that have been tabled over the past few months include: the Defamation Bill that, as the Forward explains here, would make life difficult for journalists reporting on activities of Knesset members; the Supreme Court Justice Appointment Bill, which gives Knesset Members increased powers in the process of appointing Supreme Court justices; the NGO Bill, which prohibits “foreign governmental bodies” from donating to “political” NGOs in Israel — followed by the tax bill that also proposes enormous taxes on foreign donations, and the Basic Law — The Judiciary, which aims to restrain NGOs from bringing lawsuits to the High Court of Justice.

All of these bills have one thing in common: shifting Israel’s already dubious system of checks and balances. Every single one of these laws is intended to restrain power wielded against the government, especially power that comes from the judicial system, by strengthening the executive and legislative branches of government, which are effectively one and the same.

Continue reading
Hits: 1063 0 Comments

The City of Modi'in, Israel, may yet see 50% female representation on its City Council in the next election. Mayor Haim Bibas, speaking at an evening dedicated to women in leadership last week, said that he personally hopes to see women as fully equals in the local party lists in 2013.

Continue reading
Hits: 1327 0 Comments

Recent events in the Likud party exposing layers of corruption and criminal activity have brought up a nagging question for me: Can a person be both a great leader and a great human being?

I used to think of this as the quintessential "Bill Clinton" question - named for the man who managed to do some marvelous things for his country while privately behaving like a pig – although clearly the issue predates Bill. A quick sampling of twentieth century leaders includes: John F. Kennedy the forgiven adulterer; Theodore Herzl, the STD-infected, womanizing alcoholic; Sigmund Freud, the delusional, controlling, sex-obsessed misogynist. It’s a typecast, the powerful guy who makes headlines but you wouldn't want to marry or work for him.

Continue reading
Hits: 1139 0 Comments